Monday 29 April 2019

Movie Review: Avengers Endgame

*an energy portal opens in the backyard of a house where Annie walks out*

Annie: Ok, im here. *looks around to first meet Team Blast, but turns out there's Eric Blakron, Bryan Emmerich, Blackonne and Sally Ukrone, but no Smash, Marian Blakron, TBag and Mystica* Hey there, what happened to the other members?

Bryan Emmerich: Welcome to our universe, but yeah, as i said before, you're not the only one who witnessed the event where nearly everyone are all disappeared. We just call you for help.

Annie: Why?

Eric Blakron: Because he have to find the way to bringing everyone back the way it used to be. We have top fight Thanos and hopefully if we got his gauntlet to using it to complete our goal.

Annie: To... Using a rocket ship?

Bryan Emmerich: Yes, build it from last year, we have to blast away into different universe to find him.

Annie: This can be hard like its gonna take a years to going through there.

Bryan Emmerich: Don't worry, our ship has a special hyper-drive that we can go travelling.

Annie: Ah, it kinda make sense.

*As they going into their ship, they flies away from Earth in order to blasting through another universe. Just then, Annie strangely found a comic book of called "Endgame"*

Annie; Huh... I guess i can watching it and talking about it...

(Review starts)


Hey everyone, my name is Annie and welcome back to the movie review.

For the past ten years, we had seen every MCU films that they introduced us that we all know and love, aside from some that are disappointed. But in 2018, we had "Infinity War", which it was despite its a great film, but it jumped the gun in the ending where we lost nearly everyone in MCU, so after one year, we're going to the last chapter of Infinity War.

"Avengers Endgame" is a 2019 Marvel Superhero film directed by Anthony and Joe Russo, produced by Kevin Feige (like many MCU films he's done) and written by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely.

With this film, we can all agree its one of the biggest anticipation film we've been waiting for with our heroes going on round two against Thanos one more time since before. But of course, it was a 3 hours long movie that most people like me will never go to the bathroom to watch the rest of the movie. Unless some will gotta go if there's no action with more focus of dialogues or something. But of course, this film was trending of "#NoSpoilers", which even though i will talking about the movie's story, but i won't go further and further, otherwise il be exposed.

So, with all that said, will this movie is a worth of waiting to saving the universe, is this film that we're stuck forever in "Endgame" with  nearly no populations?

Well, lets find out...!

The Story
Since we're in Endgame, we expected to have an epic rematch where Thanos keeps his stone in his homeland, right? Well, this one is pretty different and kinda complicated. But it doesn't mean its bad, but its actually impressive.

It picks up three weeks after the event of Infinity War, Tony Stark and Nebula are stranded in space that their ship is running out, but they're eventually being rescued by Captain Marvel to send back to Earth to reunite the remains of Avengers. Which they're going for a rematch against Thanos, but it was too late that the Infinity Stones are gone from his gauntlet. That resulting to fast forward five years later, where the world is like in semi post-apocalyptic future, Scott Lang strangely came back from the quantum realm (since the mid-credit of "Ant-Man and The Wasp", Spoiler Alert), which he's in the verge of panic for a help. Which turns out, not only he got stuck in quantum realm, but it also made him in time travelling, which Steve Rogers (aka Captain America) got his intention from Scott to building a time machine and bring the Infinity stones. Its up to our remaining heroes of Avengers to travelling back in time to get the stones once and for last time.

Like i said, i though it would've been great for the rematch where Thanos keeps his stones, but that didn't happened, instead its all about time traveling. Which is fine, but it has an interesting execution that this movie has a deja vu feel when they're going back in time, which our heroes are separately into previous films like "The Avengers" (which i liked, despite its a bit flawed), "Thor: The Dark World" (a sequel which is not a good sequel before Ragnarok.) and "Guardians of the Galaxy" (which is easily a fun movie thats its definitely recommended to watch). Plus, despite it still have  funny moments (which its some jokes are funny), but it also adds a drama, since after Infinity War, we want to have some sad moments when the universe remains in depression with half living. Even though the whole time traveling is maybe good, but it has a flaws, which the first act is dragging on for nearly an hour after failed interrogation at Thanos, i understand to give us a character development from the aftermath, but come on, it would've been take a small action since its a three hours long movie. But sometimes it has a same plot element from Infinity War, but in different way, but i don't wanna get a full detail.

Even though its what i expected for the story, but the story is interesting with some good execution, even if some part could dragging on in the first act.

The Presentation
Once again, like any previous MCU films, the presentation are impressive for the actions, the suits, the location and more, but this one is pretty big with $356 million of budget, making it even more expensive, but AS expensive than "Avengers: Age of Ultron".

Lets start with the setting of the location, the location of the aftermath of Infinity War looks pretty moody and depressing with over grown plants and abandoned places, its typical that we've seen before, but not bad. But like i said before, the movie brought us a flash back of three previous films, its pretty nice to brought us the same old locations, even if i was nervous if the old characters could get noticed from our current heroes, even if it could be funny or disturbing.

As for the action scenes, man, this is gonna be huge, like a lot of action scenes are taken place from the pasts and perhaps in present, but some of them are pretty cool, and other are downright epic, but again, i won't going further. Most of action scenes is all about get the stones before Thanos gets them all for good reason, even though sometimes, some moments where anyone get the stone could be confusing if some like me never seen before, like the reality stone are found in Thor's sequel film. Yeah, im one of those people that avoided this weakest film, despite it has a reality stone that it was used to be Aether.

And lastly, we get the superhero/villains appearance, its quiet obvious that most of them are done in practical, while others are done with motion capture like Thanos, the various creatures and few others. Some of new outfits are pretty good like Iron Man's suit (as usual), Ant-Man (plus, it has an Easter Egg that we can easily notice) and Thor's armor. And some is nice to bring back, like the Captain America's outfit with his signature shield since it got destroyed by Iron Man in Civil War or even Rocket Raccoon's classic outfit that was based on comic, thats another nice Easter Egg.

Despite some some are recycle and hard to tell that i've never heard, but once again, this film looks pretty cool with actions, the appearance, the location and the CG details are outstanding and possibly colorful.

The Characters
With the same casts as before, not only they're still likable whether they remains the same and some has a new developments. Even if some of survivor are missing that they would've make more appearance.

This movie focuses with the remaining heroes such as Iron Man (played by Robert Downey Jr for the last time in MCU), Captain America (played by Chris Evans, also last time in MCU), Thor (played by Chris Hemsworth), The Hulk (played by Mark Ruffalo), Black Widow (played by Natasha Romanoff), Hawkeye (played by Jeremy Renner), War Machine (played by Don Cheadle), Scott Lang's Ant-Man (played by Paul Rudd), Nebula (played by Karen Gillan), Rocket Raccoon (played by Bradley Cooper) and recently Captain Marvel (played by once again, Brie Larson).

These guys are only the focus to their goal of time traveling. In fact, some of them got changed, such as Tony Stark (aka Iron Man) lives in his cabin to have his daughter Morgan, which at first he doesn't want to go without her, but accept for his journey after five years, Thor become an overweight god with eating and drinking, not sure how he getting fat, but my only guess he must had been depressed over his loss (even though it was Chris's another idea for the change), Bruce is permanently turned into Hulk form, though a bit due to his balance of his sides with experimentation for his intelligent and strength, and there's Hawkeye that due to losing his family, he turned into an anti-hero to killing bad guys, though this was based on another character named "Ronin" (despite there's no Ronin in this film, guess we gotta wait for the next saga).
However, before the film's release, they're few other characters in the poster that they're also survived, but barely appeared such as Pepper Potts (played by Gwyneth Paltrow, which it was also her final role of MCU), Okoye (played by Danai Gurira), Wong (played by Benedict Wong), Happy Hogan (played by my favorite actor/producer/director Jon Favreau) and Valkyrie (played by Tessa Thompson), they're basically shown in small appearance for some reasons, talk a bout a waste of potential from their posters.

As for the other heroes died? Well, they'll be back, but we have to wait for a while, and once again, i won't tell how they're resurrected.

And finally there's Thanos (once again, played by Josh Brolin), like i said, i still like this character for his sympathetic figure for what he cared about before changed his life to be a menacing titan to stealing Infinity Stones. Here, at first we though he's still stronger after the snap, but ended being weaken after left alone in his own farm. But current Thanos isn't the main antagonist, its the other Thanos is the real antagonist. But once again, Josh Brolin is still doing a great work of his role.

And lastly that i forgot to mention, is Stan Lee's cameo, this time they made him in digitally de-age of 1970's and it was considered his last cmaeo in cinema history, its a nice tribute for him, rest in peace, old friend...

As i said, the acting are always enjoyable to see with some of our favorite actors over 11 years, especially some are always have fun like Paul Rudd's Scott Lang and some others. Even if some actors who played our favorite characters have a time to say goodbye after the saga, but we still enjoy the characters in MCU, especially some have an upgrade following the Endgame.

And now for my final opinion of this film.
Overall, Avengers Endgame is probably the best superhero film of 2019, with a story that its not what expected, but pretty good, the presentation is once again awesome for the actions and appearances and the characters are once again, likable. Even its an three hours long film, it could get forever, before the main event, some location are a bit generic that we've seen before and some actions a bit lacking from the first act as i mentioned before. But the movie does have a deja vu with the time traveling sequence and its easily fitting to have a drama for the aftermath of Thanos's snap or even some other moments in this film, like before i got shocked and sad for some moments and even the end, than again, i won't tell more. But, this isn't the final film of the saga, we still have one more film, such as "Spider-Man: Far from home".

If you wanna see the epic finale of the saga of MCU, i highly recommend to watch it, but make sure you eat or drink too much while watching a three hours film.

My rating will be pretty hard, which i wanted to give this one maybe 9, but since this is the final part of the saga with some moment with an epic actions and drama, i decided to going with a perfect 10/10.

So this ends of my movie review, if you guys have your opinion or any suggestions, let me know at comment bellow and support me on KO-FI.com/blackevil.

Thanks for reading, and im Annie, signing out.

(Review ends)

Sally Ukrone: Wow... This is... pretty emotional...

Annie: I know, but then again, this isn't over of their universe.

*but the ship stops to arrive at the planet where Thanos lives*

Bryan Emmerich: Ah-ha, we're here.

Annie: Alright, looks like we need to tell him to fight back and fixing our universe, right?

To Be Continued...!

Sunday 14 April 2019

Movie review: Shazam!


Hey everyone, im Annie and welcome back to the movie review.

Ever since Marvel Cinematic Universe became a huge franchise for fun actions and likable characters, but what the heck is wrong with "DC Extended Universe"? DCEU is totally gotten worse as time went, not just of disappointing films what we have, but also nearly everyone are walking away such as Ben Affleck, Erza Miller and maybe Henry Cavill (since he's probably gonna get replaced by Michael B. Jordan). And so, we're very unclear if DCEU will still going, or maybe they're seriously need to be rebooted. However, since we have our next standalone film after Aquaman, we're hoping if DC could make something lighter than before, but it definitely does.

"Shazam!" is a 2019 DC superhero film directed by David F. Sandberg, produced by Peter Safran, then written by Henry Gayden and Darren Lemke.

Like i said, we've lost our hope and respect for DCEU for their disappointing films what we've seen (except for Wonder Woman), we would think if its gonna get bad right? Well, since we saw the trailer, it got a lot of attention that it looks like fun and going in lighter tone what it should've been. Not to mention, this project had a hell development back in 2000 and the film was supposed to include The Rock as "Black Adam", but that didn't happen, which Black Adam has to wait for either a sequel or maybe his own standalone film, since the project has been changed until what we have here.

So, with all that said, will this movie holds up if Shazam will rise in the light, or is Carol Danvers overshadowing him when he used to be named "Captain  Marvel" for infringing reason?

Well, lets find out.

The Story
With a movie about Shazam, you'll think that they've learn their lesson to know about our hero and something lighter? Well surprisingly, they've done right.

It started back in 1974, where a young boy name Thaddeus Sivana who's unexpectedly being transported into a different dimension known as "Rock of Eternity", where he met a old man wizard name "Shazam" who's the last wizard of the council of seven wizards. However, Thaddeus didn't know and curiously wanted to get an orb called "Eye of  Sin", but he was banished back to Earth, because he was deemed worthless. Fast-forward to present time, we introduce Billy Batson, a kid who's adopted by the foster family when he was being lost from his mother. After attempt to save his disabled best friend/brother Freddie from the bullies, he ran away to the subway, but not before he was also transported to Rock of Eternity where he meets a dying Shazam, saying that "Eye of Sin" was stolen from grew up Thaddeus Sivana where he not gain his powers, but also summoning seven deadly sins, the wizard gives his own power to Billy by calling the name into a superhero known as "Shazam". Its up to Billy to not only testing himself as a superhero, but also dealing against Thaddeus once and for all.

Even though its just another typical superhero story as usual, but the origin of Billy was started from sad to enjoyable as the movie went on. Especially for the Shazam's testing montage, it is quite fun and nice to showcase his powers. But what it makes this film good is that it has a lighter tone and a sense of humor, even though its odd that it takes place on Christmas(?), but it has better light tone than "Justice League" and of course, this film is funny as heck, especially when it comes to a montage, the jokes and even a silly nicknames to avoiding transformation (for obviously avoiding secret identity). Even if it should've been on the first place.

Even though the story is much like any typical superhero movies, but the execution are  much better for better light tone, nice direction and a fun sense of humor.

The Presentation
With a lighter tone, we expect the presentation of this movie looks fun with action and entertaining, well yeah.

The filming location is pretty nice, especially that it takes place on Philadelphia, with the poor village and the scene where Shazam and Billy sits together on the steps in front of Art Museum, i can't help but think "I sense the similar location of "Rocky" movie.". Aside Philadelphia, they also filmed in Ontario with the school, the shopping center and a generating station. In other words, this movie is 50% taking place in Philadelphia. Even though its the same location for taking place in DCEU.

As for the action scenes and the CG, it looks much more better than "Justice League" for the graphic detail, fight scenes and power effects. Even if some say it was the cheapest DCEU film ever made between 80 to 100 million dollars of estimated budget. The action scenes with montage and fighting are fun and entertaining in the same time, especially for the powers, they looks great, even if the smoke (which it summons the seven deadly sins) are a bit cheap. As for the designs of the seven deadly sins, despite they look pretty average what they appeared, but they they look pretty scary, especially with red eyes, geez they looks rather terrifying, even though they're appeared from either motion capture or even CGI.

And  finally, you're probably wondering my though of Shazam's suit? Well, it looks pretty simple what he appears, but it looks pretty good and kinda look faithful from the comic, especially with light of his logo on the chest and on his wrists, which obviously the suit has a battery on its back.

Despite it was considered as a "cheapest budget" of DCEU film, but i find the presentation looks pretty good for actions, the creepy seven deadly sins designs, Shazam's suit and probably a better detail of CG.

The Characters
Since this is a movie about Shazam, we expected that the characters are gonna be likable for their development? Well, they've done it better what we expected like Aquaman.

First is our titular hero Billy Batson, aka Shazam (played by Asher Angel for Billy and Zachary Levi for Shazam). As a Billy kid, i find him to be good, despite he's a bit emotionless, but at least Asher's acting is better than the kids from Tim Burton's Dumbo. But when he transformed into Shazam, Levi's easily steals the show for his fun and cocky role, you can tell Zachary have to playing as our titular hero. And for his abilities, he has powers based on immortal elders (along with combination of his name), "Wisdom of Solomon" represents intelligence, "Strength of Hercules" is obviously super strength, "Stamina of Atlas" means superhuman ability, likely invulnerability, "Power of Zeus" is of course, lightning power, "Courage of Achilles" means the power of will, and "Speed of Mercury" means super speed. Even though in my old time, i didn't care pretty much about Shazam, but as time goes, im started to liking him, he's not like my number one favorite hero in DC, but at least its the first time i learned about him.

Then we have Billy's best friend/brother Freddie (played by Jack Dylan Grazer), he;s also a likable character in this movie, despite being disabled, but he's a fan of superheroes, which we can see he collected various stuff from either Batman (like Batarang) and a crushed bullets from Superman's indestructible. And of course, since he first meet Shazam, he sorta act like a mentor to write down the list what abilities Shazam has and possibly teaching him for how to be a superhero. Even though he's a fan of superhero, Grazer is also did a great work of his role. Which obviously makes us wishing he could also become a superhero, right?

While the rest of the foster kids, they're not much else to say, but more likely the kids on token list, there's Darla Dudley (played by young Faithe Herman) is a energetic playful girl, Mary Bromfield (played by Grace Fulton) who's a den mother for the kids,  Eugene Choi (played by Ian Chen) is a gaming boy with the brain and Pedro Peña (played by Jovan Armand) a shy kid who doesn't want to be in trouble, but more best way to describe him in the words of Scott Steiner: "He's FAT!!" (Sorry...)

As for the foster parents like Rosa and Victor Vasquez (played by Marta Milans and Cooper Andrews), they're basically a parents for adopting five kids for... Plot development for Billy?

And there's the old wizard named "Shazam" (played by Djimon Hounsou, who previously played as Ricou in Aquaman), who's only shown in the first act as a plot device to Billy to becoming a hero as a last wizard of the council. Even though there's not much else about him, but Djimon did a nice work of his role.

And finally, we have the main antagonist Thaddeus Savina (played by Mark Strong), he's a bad guy wants revenge against Wizard Shazam for stealing the Eye of Sin for not only has give him powers, but also summons the seven deadly sins. Though he has a great power, but he's a typical ruthless bad who wants to taking over humanities with monsters. Even though he's pretty average for his personality, but Mark did a great work of his role, he has cool powers and probably a somewhat better villain than Carlton Drake from Venom.

The characters in the movie are easily better for their development, their personality and their fun acting.

And now for my final opinion of this film.
Overall, Shazam is easily one of the best DCEU film ever done, with good execution for the story, great actions and presentation and the characters are likable, including Zachary's main role of Shazam. Even though Wonder Woman did good, but Shazam easily topped over for better light tone, fun acting and it was also funny to watch. This is the film that again, what it should've been on the first place after all the disappointing films what we have. So, if you're a fan of DC superhero movie, i highly recommend to watch it, its a film that it won't disappoints. Go see it, my friend...!

Though, i wanted to give 10 for a perfect DCEU film, but it has some flaws with an ok villain and some of CG could be a bit of problem. So for that, i give this movie a 9/10.

So this ends of my movie review, if you guys have your opinion or any suggestions, let me know at comment bellow and support me on KO-FI.com/blackevil.

Thanks for reading, and im Annie, signing ou--

*review ends with a phone ringing*

Annie: *grabs her phone* Yeah-hello?

??? (on phone): Are you Annie from other universe?

Annie: Yeah its me? What do you want?

???: Come to our universe, we need to talk...

To be Continued...

Sunday 7 April 2019

Movie review: Dumbo 2019

???: *grabs a phone* Hello? Yes, i just want to call to tell me what's happening here? You noticed too? Good god, i've never though that i saw one of my friend is like disintegrated of non-existence for like no reason what so ever and even everyone are in the verge of panic from the occurrence. Yeah... There's gotta be the way to bring nearly everyone back, but i don't know how we can figure out what to do. Ok, call me later when we found the plan. *hangs out and sighs* Well, i guess im gonna be replacement of movie review's host...!


Hi everyone, my name is Annie and welcome back to movie review.

From before, 2018 had a lot of superhero movies that some are great to watch, but others are either ok to bellow. But when we're in 2019, im might be concerned to say that Hollywood are going to releasing plenty of remakes of previous movies in order to appeal for modern viewers, which it might be an easy sign that they're definitely running out of ideas with their budgets, but Disney is one of them that they're bringing not one, but four remakes and i gotta review them, along with some others outside of Disney.

"Dumbo 2019" is... Well, a 2019 live action fantasy adventure film directed by Tim Burton, produced by Justin Springer, Katterli Frauenfelder and Derek Frey, then written by Ehren Kruger (also producing).

This was Tim Burton's revision of the 1941 animated film with the same name by Walt Disney, which this film was made when Walt had a financial problem following the release of Fantasia, since it was the time before WWII. So for some reason, Tim and crew members decided to cashing in that when we first heard about it, we're very skeptical for Tim's announcement, but it got a lot of attention from the trailer that maybe this could be original than being copycat from the 1941 version?

So, with all that said, will this remake will able to fly high, or is this film really humiliating with name calling like "Dumbo"?

Well, lets find out.

The Story
With this remake, its actually quite different what we've expected for the story and the setting.

It takes place in 1919, where a amputee of WWI and an equestrian performer names Holt Farrier return with his kids and his buddy ringmaster Max Medici after the war, but the reunion was too soon that Max's circus is having a financial trouble, which he was forced to sell horses and Holt's wife Annie sadly died from the outbreak of "Spanish Flu", which Holt was forced to taking care a female elephant that they gave her a name "Mrs. Jumbo". But one day, Hold, his fellow members and his kids Joe and Milly noticed that Miss Jumbo has a baby with strangely big ears, which they originally calling him as "Jumbo Jr". But when they brought for the performance of his debut, the debut went embarrassing that after an accident and his reveal, the crowd start mocking him as "Dumbo", causing Miss Jumbo went aggressive for his humiliation and ruined the circus, causing her to be taking away for dangerous reason, leaving Dumbo all alone with Farrier's family. But little did the kids know, they noticed when Dumbo sucks a feather, it gives him the ability to fly with ears. Its up to the Farrier's family and Max find out whether Dumbo is worth of performance or not.

Personally, im rather glad that they don't do a copycat of the original version to focusing with talking animals, because it will be considered as an abomination remake, which they mainly focus with the main humans to rooting for Dumbo, which im glad that they made the story different. Unfortunately, having a completely different story would've been better for the execution, likely it has an extra plot with an entrepreneur to bringing Max Medici and Dumbo to "Dreamland" for money, which it may sounds good idea, but its obviously predictable that we've seen or heard it before when entrepreneur is bad to make money, in the most cliche element of any films out there. But another problem about the movie is the lack of heart moment. Well sure, we do have some heart felt moment where Jumbo is being sold away from her aggressive nature and with the kids comforting Dumbo, but as the movie went, the heart element just ended lackluster. Though yes, we do have "Baby mine" moment, but it was short and it was on the first act.

The story is a good change, but most of the execution just comes off as a lackluster and probably predictable.

The Presentation
Since this is a Tim Burton's movie, you think the presentation itself will look great for art direction? Well, i'd say yes and no.

For starter, the story taking place in 1919 is actually good how it takes place, the filming location is wonderful shot and some of the setting of the circus and the attraction park called "Dreamland" are amazing and yet colorful, since this is a movie all about circus.

Another good presentation is the performances in the circus or even marching, whenever there's the play without Dumbo (perhaps),  it always enjoy to see, especially for the costumes, the way they shows and or even the tricks are quite fun and entertaining, i know sometimes some are done in CG, but some could be practical, even though they don't something cartoony way.

Speaking of CG, Dumbo himself looks rather cute, though i get they wanted to make him look as a real elephant for the detail, but sometimes it feels like they're trying to make him cute, but not for a big adorable eyes, which i find him a bit cartoony. And of course, they do brought back the infamous "Pink Elephant" scene, but the good thing about it as that at least they didn't make Dumbo being drunk, it was done by the performers with bubbles, but geez, the Pink Elephants are completely desperate to be like the original, but not for the modern CG that they look awfully cartoony, since they obviously using the element of squash and stretch and the detail is soo video game-lish. But sorry Burton, i stick the original Pink Elephant.

The the art direction is pretty good for Tim Burton with suits, performances and the setting, but some of the CGs are bellow average.

The Characters
Since the movie mainly focus with humans, you'll think that the humans will have a purpose and likable in the remake? Once again, yes and no.

First is Holt Farrier (played by Collin Farrell), at first, i though that he's gonna be the main human for the story and maybe helping Dumbo. But no, Holt is pretty much have no purpose but just came back from WWI, but missing his arm and caring about his kids and Max and thats it. Though Collin did a nice job of his acting, but his role is pretty much as a cardboard cutout.

Then we have Farrier's kids, Joe and Milly (played by Finley Hobbins and Nico Parker), even though they're replacing Timothy Q. Mouse, but im ok to having kids comforting Dumbo which in order to rooting for him and have a sympathy to relate. Even though the kids are rather 25% likable, but their development are underdeveloped, where Joe is an enthusiastic boy and Milly likes to be a smart scientist. but of course, their acting bellow they one are either annoying or even emotionless. Though im fine for kids with Dumbo, but the execution would've done better for extra development and maybe re-shoot.

Next there's Max Medici (played by Danny DeVito), he's ringmaster who's not only being boisterous, but also have a good heart to our main heroes. Even though he's also a character to struggling from financial of his own circus, which i think i like his development more than the original. But like Holt, he have not purpose for the plot. But to be fair, Danny DeVito did a great work of his role, since he's pretty much as being Danny DeVito.

Then we have Colette Marchant (played by Eva Green), a trapeze artist that despite being with Vandevere, but like the kids, she's also rooting for Dumbo at the time. Though despite she looks beautiful and Eva's nice acting, but again, like Holt, she has nothing to do with the plot.

And finally there's V.A. Vandevere (played by Batman himself, Michael Keaton), an entrepreneur and owner of Dreamland to exploit Dumbo and Medici's circus. Even though he's typcally depicted as ruthless and enigmatic bad guy, but Keaton's role is also pretty good for his delightfully evil. But il easily stick to his role of Vulture from "Spider-Man Homecoming", because i find V.A.'s character is despite being delightfully evil, but his goal of exploiting Dumbo for money feels like a tiring villain role list.

As for the rest of the characters, there's not much else to say, though sure it has some for the jokes and maybe a sympathy for Dumbo, but again, they're not much any specials what so ever. But hey, at least there's no crows for their controversial racial stereotypes of Afro-Americans.

Despite the acting are great at the times, but its the characters are trying so hard to have a purpose with Dumbo, but ended up as lack of development or even plain as a character left on the shelf.

And now for my final opinion of this film.
Overall, Tim Burton's Dumbo may have a potential for a different way, but ended up being tripped with some problems. The story is nice for the changed, but not for the lack of heart and the typical exploiting for money, the presentation looks pretty good for the settings, but not for some of bad CG and the characters that they have some interesting casts and acting (most of), but not for underdeveloped and waste of space.

Like i said before, it may have a potential, but ended up into problems when it comes to their execution of the humans or a different story. But since this is a Tim Burton's movie, i don't think its not bad or good, its rather pretty average. Its not the best remake like "The Jungle Book 2016" or the worst like "Ghostbusters 2016" Its just "Ok" level like "Death Wish 2018". So, i don't know if i recommend to watch this if you never heard of "Dumbo", otherwise, stick to the 1941 classic one by Walt Disney.

So, i give this movie is 5/10.

So this ends of my movie review, if you guys have your opinion or any suggestions, let me know at comment bellow and support me on KO-FI.com/blackevil.

Thanks for reading, and im Annie, signing out.

*review ends*

Annie: Huh, this is the first time im doing a review, but, im not sure if im gonna be a full on replacement from a man who's like me or something...

To be Continued...