Movie Review: The Fall Guy

 

Hey everyone, my name is Anthony and welcome back to my Movie Review.

You know, when we’re making movies like action, horror, adventures or others, doing stunts a one dangerous and tough aspect to do a traditional effects, whether be a car chase, being thrown out, jump away from explosions and many more, stunt performers are no strangers to putting their lives on the line for execution, some can go nice, but others could be at risk for either injuries, or worse, death on set. But what if we have a movie, instead of typical movie within a making a movie like “Singing in the Rain”, “Ed Wood” or “Living in Oblivion”, what about a movie within a making a movie that involves a life struggling as a stunt performer? Well, someone has the answer that happens to be based on a TV show.

“The Fall Guy” is a 2024 action-comedy film that was produced/directed by David Leitch, co-produced by Kelly McCormick, Ryan Gosling (Yup, Beach Ken is also work as producer), and Guymon Casady, then written by Drew Pearce.

From many decades ago, The Fall Guy was first introduced as a TV show, aired on ABC in 1981, the show had a good review from critics and audience involving a stunt performer who also work as a bounty hunter. The show was, surprisingly, lasted 5 seasons from 1981 to 1986. With the show has now earning a cult following, somebody in Hollywood wanted to make a movie based on a show. It all started in 2010 that DreamWorks Picutres was planning to making their own movie based on the show with veteran producers like Walter F. Parkes and Laurie MacDonald and James Bond movies director Martin Campbell as a director, but that plan has been changed to giving Disney subsidiary brand Touchstone Pictures for national releases, along with replacement roles, like McG is gonna be a new director role, but alas, the project was left to nothing for so many years. But then came in late 2020, where Universal Pictures brought it back from the grave with new roles after it was originally planned, along with new people took over the project.

But as always, im gonna do a comparison between a movie and show, because I never seen the show.

So, with all that said, will the stunt and bounty hunting will be a good double business, or doing a real life stunt as bounty hunter is like a death wish?

Well, lets find out.

The Story

For a movie about stuntman going on a journey to fighting against crime? Its rather cliché, but it does have its creative execution.

The movie begins in a montage of many films that we’ve seen many stunts what they pulling off back then, because stunt performers (as well as some actors doing their stunts like Tom Cruise, but its different story) are putting lives on the line to pulling off some challenging and dangerous stunts to pull off to get paid for both actors, producers, writers and directors. Anyway, we introduce our stuntman name “Colt Seavers” who’s been doing stunts in several movies as a Stunt Double to the action actor Tom Ryder. But in one day, Colt pulls a stunt when he acts like he’s falling down the ground with harness and wires, but instead it ended up as a stunt gone wrong that he ended up broke his back really badly, leaving him injured and abandoning his career and his relationship on Judy Moreno. Fast Forward to 18 months later, while he’s pretty much relaxing on his own, he got himself smitten by Gail Meyer at Mexican restaurant, Gail, as a producer of Tom Ryder’s movies, is asking him to come back to the set to giving him another chance. Doubtful at first, but he accepts for his comeback to be involved with an upcoming movie called “Metalstorm”, but little did he knows, is that his ex Jody is pissed from being broke that she wasn’t planning to rehiring him. However, around the time after pulling a multiple stunts from car rolling crash to launching himself from explosion, Gail tells Colt that Tom Ryder is missing after having a legal trouble from drug dealers. Despite of causing the movie’s potential cancellation, its up to Colt on his journey to finding Tom without getting into legal trouble on public.

While the movie plays like a typical rescue mission movie, as well as the name clearing plot, but it has a nicely addition with a mix of these with making a movie element and having a stuntman pulling a real life stunt rather than doing a movie stunts, it may sounds like an odd concept, but its execution for a mix of action movie and a real life action to making our main hero feels like he’s in both worlds, especially for dealing his obstacles from fighting against Tom’s ex, interrogation with drug dealer Doone to even some other parts that tricking him, especially with the aforementioned Doone that he was setting up to drugging him in a cocktail into one colorful hallucination. Since its an action comedy, im surprisingly find some humors in the movie actually made me laugh, sure, some jokes can be hit or miss, but the jokes in the are actually both good and funny, especially some moment that I was like laughing my butt off. For an action movie, this one is rather soft as a PG rated movie, with a rather less profanity, they can be worked, but some action scene might be kinda too safe, more on the later at Presentation.

While the story is typical from frameup to rescue, but its the execution of this movie to making it both good, creative and also funny at the same time.

The Presentation

The movie’s budget costs about between $125 - $150M, the movie’s presentation is surprisingly looks pretty good, along with movie’s stunts.

For starter, I first though that this movie is filmed somewhere in Nevada or even in North of Mexico and then green screen at sound stage, but in reality, because I was naive without realization, it was filmed in Australia, commonly in its country’s capital Sydney or even somewhere in the desert, they did a nice work for their filming in Australia ranging from action stunts in the city of Sydney or even filming set in somewhere in the desert, then later making post-production effect in, I think producers’ screen test with those effects in a fictional movie Metalstorm.

Speaking of effects, the effects are minimal of CG to more focus on practical effects, and of course, the good’ol fashion stunts, While the effects in a fictional movie looks nice, but one part that I enjoy is when Colt fighting against bad guys while in hallucination, it goes into a flashy, colorful and neon comic-like effect in fighting, it looks pretty good one for what they pulled. As for the practical effects, its no stranger that they pulled a real stunts from either throwing around in the air with harness and wires or even doing a parkour. I guess its not hard to see why David Leitch said that he wanted those stunts to be authentic and calling this “letter to stunts”. But one of the highlight of this movie is the stunt scene with cars, I mean, if you may not know me, I like seeing car stunts, commonly with car chases, but this one took to a challenging level that in one scene that they’re using a cannon device into the ground from car’s moving (pretty common for most car stunts), when they pulled off, the car ended up rolling in eight and a half when stunt driver Logan Holladay pulled off, as a result, not only it looked impressive and yet risky, but it also broke the record at “Guinness World Record” for “The most cannon rolls in a car”, il give a credit for what they pulled off and big congrats for them for their new record to Guinness.

As for the action scenes, they’re good for its movie’s focus for dealing for both stunt performance and beat down, ranging from hallucination fight, an apartment fight (twice) to one of the riskiest of all, a fight in a middle of moving rubbish truck with, like any stuntmen, Colt putting his life for his obstacles to keeping himself alive against baddies. However, the fight scenes are not as brutal nor even killing, since, as I said before, its Rated PG, we never be able to see a brutal or bloody death, like one bad guy gets hit by a sign and somehow survived with get killed from broken neck, that’s an example im pointed out that the fight scenes are rather soft to have body count due to being a PG Rated film. I mean sure, we may see a blood or bruise, but again, too soft and safe.

However, another nitpick I have for the movie’s presentation is the soundtrack. Don’t get me wrong, the music soundtrack by Dominic Lewis is good that I can say, along with the use of music from Taylor Swift, AC/DC and Phil Collins. But what I meant is the overuse of the song in this movie called “I was made for lovin’ you” by KISS, along with its cover by Yungblud, it felt like I listen to it, either from the original song or being composed, its just too much that Dom could’ve make something different rather than recycle from KISS’s song.

Soundtrack issue aside, the movie’s presentation looks pretty for filming Down Under to fun stunts.

The Characters

Even though without the comparison between the show and the movie, I find the characters in this movie are both good and fun performance.

Lets start off with the main hero Colt Seavers (played by Beach Ken himself, Ryan Gosling), a main stunt performer and real life action as a bounty hunter for the whereabouts of Tom Ryder. He’s a struggled stuntman after had a near career ending injury from 18 months ago that, despite he comes back to the movies for another stunts, but also trying to get a new life with a new girlfriend after breaking up his ex, even its he’s like a veteran stunt performer, even though he’s like he’s in 40s. But, I find him both fascinating and fun, not because of his stunts of action, but also fun committing performance from Gosling, after all, he’s the same guy who played Ken that he’s pretty funny in his performance, along with “Im just Ken”, he did a fun work of his performance.

Next up is Jody Moreno (played by Emily Blunt), she’s a then-producer turned female film director for her directorial debut of Metalstorm and Colt’s ex that even when they reunited, it wasn’t an easy welcome return, that is until they’ll reconciling later in the movie (though not gonna SPOILING this movie for the final result of their relationship). I find her mixed that she’s either disgusted from his breakup or trying to changing her heart, or maybe both for being neutral. Don’t get me wrong, Emily did a great work of her performance, but its just that the writing is mixed bag that I had a hard time to think if she’s good for trying to reuniting Colt or being neutral when she wasn’t so happy to see him again after what happened to Colt’s incident.

After that, we have Tom Ryder (played by Aaron Taylor-Johnson, aka Kick-Ass), a main action actor whom, despite he has a great reputation of his role in action films, but he also has a dark cloud when he disappeared based on his legal trouble with drug dealer. Im pretty he’s based on when actors were fallen from grace with allegations or scandals, when it comes to Tom, he took to a new level that despite he’s meant to be famous, he also has a dark rumor when he’s involve with drugs or allegedly kill somebody, but again, not gonna SPOIL the latter. I find him rather fascinating, especially I would love to see him to have a backstage beef at Colt about the injury or the fame, but its too bad he has a very minimal appearance as a villainous actor, he’s only seen a bit in the first act and third act cause I think Aaron did nice work of his performance, it would’ve been great to knowing what’s happening on him, but it probably focuses too much on Colt’s action.

Finally, there’s Gail Meyer (played by Hannah Waddingham), the new producer of Jody’s new film and she’s the one who’s giving a plot convenient for Tom Ryder’s whereabouts. While she’s responsible to bringing Colt into mission for finding Tom Ryder, but sometimes, we smell some rats about her setup that maybe she’s on Ryder’s side in attempting bringing him back to film making in attempt to make Colt into a bad image when Jody wasn’t so happy to see him again after he broke up. Which she’s probably responsible for the clearing the name plot for, again, secretly trying to put Colt away to finding Ryder either he has a legal trouble or framing Colt, but again, not gonna SPOILING it. Which I find her to be rather nice written character and Hannah did a nice work of her role.

As for the rest of the characters, there not much to say, either for plot or appeared for subplot, there’s Iggy Starr (played by Teresa Palmer) who’s Tom Ryder’s girlfriend, Alma Milan (played by Stephanie Hsu) who’s Tom Ryder’s personal assistant for being kidnapped in a rubbish truck, Doone (played by Matuse) is a drug dealer for Tom, and Dan Tucker (played by Winston Duke) who’s both Colt’s best friend and stunt coordinator.

While most characters have minor or no development, but the four main characters are both fascinating and have their fun performances, even if some them deserves better for more screen time than less.

And now for my final opinion of this film

Overall, The Fall Guy is a fun action movie, even though im not familiar with the show, despite my parents remembered it from many decades ago before I was born.

Aside my knowledge of the show, but I enjoyed it for its action scenes, the practical stunts, some good post-production effects, a creative story (for the most part), the writing is descent, some humors are chuckle and laugh worthy, and the characters are good with fun acting.

However, it may not be as perfect with problems like overuse of KISS’s famous song, either in composed or covered, some fights can be good, but could be too soft because its PG, and some characters are either could’ve make sense from the writing or a minimal of screen time due to the focus of Colt.

Though im sure some fans of The Fall Guys (if you’re lucky) will probably enjoy it, or maybe not. But unless if you’re a newcomer like me, I’d say this one is for you that you may enjoy to watch. This is definitely a film that I probably recommend to check it out if you like stunts or like to have an action comedy film with Ryan Gosling.

For my rating, im gonna give this one an 8/10.

So this ends of my movie review, if you guys have your opinion or any suggestions, let me know at comment bellow and support me on KO-FI.com/blackevil.

Thanks for reading, and im Anthony, signing out.

Movie Review: Unfrosted

 

Hey everyone, my name is Anthony and welcome to my Movie Review.

Today is my very first Movie Review that im covering from Netflix content. Yes my friend, I got myself a subscription on Netflix thanks to the use of redeem code card, though for my best of knowledge, Netflix is the only one that you gotta use the redeem gift card to extending the subs on Netflix, im not sure if Amazon has the same thing when they also selling their gift cards for online shopping, but Netflix has the easiest option in my mind, but its a long story. I used to hated Netflix for being forced to subscribing when the projects are borrowed into streaming platform exclusive, but Netflix isn’t the only one as we all know, despite Netflix has plenty of controversies from questionable business management, raising prices and some contents when they signed the contract from third parties like WB, Universal or others are delisted either expensive price for extension or called the day, but again, I digress. If I wanna reviewing some Netflix content, I felt like to give it a shot to watching to one of Netflix’s recent film, involving my favorite snack or breakfast.

“Unfrosted” is a 2024 comedy film that was written/produced/directed by Jerry Seinfeld, co-produced/co-written by Spike Feresten, co-produced by Beau Bauman, and co-written by Andy Robin and Barry Marder.

For many years, we’re all familiar of everyone’s favorite comedian in the 80’s and 90’s named Jerry Seinfeld, he was started in a promising stand-up comedy thanks to his open-mic in nights and showing up in talk shows in his early days, but then in 1988, he introduced his sitcom show based on himself in fiction called “Seinfeld” and it was beloved from the past and to this day, he was that good to be on TV and stand-up comedy, but being into movies? Not so much, unless there’s “Bee Movie” by Dreamworks Animation.

Anyway, when thinking of hos movie, he came up to have his own true story film about the creation of Pop-Tarts, though he said it was done as a made-up joke about its creation for his opportunity for not only starring, but also as a writer, producer and director, the latter of which is his directorial debut in his career, of course, the project is later brought up to Netflix to streaming it.

So, with all that said, will this movie will be an interesting ride of a fictional creation of Pop-Tarts, or is this joke is barely a joke of “Crazy Good”?

Well, lets find out.

The Story

For a movie in a comedy themed based on true story, I find the story can be… Followed but kinda all over the place.

The movie begins when a young boy orders a Pop-Tarts, until he curiously meet a man who created Pop-Tarts named Bob Cabana, and this leads him to explain the short story (though long story, cause… Well, its a movie), Bob works on Kellogg’s at Battle Creek, Michigan, during the hey days of 1963 when cereals was a big deal not just everyone, but also for kids with marketing mascots, along with a bitter rivalry with Post’s. After Bob oddly seeing kids in a dumpster with eating a fruity-based pastry, it may sounds like a future opportunity for kids love that fruity pastry, however, when spying on Post’s, they noticed that they’re about to hiring their former employee named Donna Stankowski (or Stan for short) to potentially taking Kellogg’s domination down, so Bob calls his boss Edsel Kellogg III to give Stan a second chance to rehiring her for creating their very own fruity-themed pastry. However, Kellogg’s is called by Post’s head names “Marjorie Post” for meeting with cereal brands, including Quaker, Purina (Yes, even pet food brand used to making cereals) and General Mills, she said that within one week, the cereal products are going to be on the shelves, Bob sees as a panic alert in order to obtaining rights in 99% of sugar making from Puerto Rico, its up to Bob Cabana and Kellogg’s to work hard for making their new product without losing themselves from either taste or even risking their working environment, and not to mention, Post tries to creating their own fruity-themed pastry.

It sounds like a unique plot that even though its based on a creation of Pop-Tarts, this one is more fictional, even if its sounds like a mockumentary film, just to making some jokes at some elements in the movie, about Kellogg’s innovation of fruity pastry. However, the movie has changing some subject that interrupted the plot such as when Bob is kidnapped by the milk syndicate over milk that it potentially going to declining when both Kellogg’s and Post’s are making their rivalry for their pastry over milk and cereal, as well as mascot employees posing a threat of strike for their working environment of focusing on pastry over cereal, and then there’s also that when the both brands went out in Puerto Rico and USSR (aka Russia) in order to securing their sugar business rights to save their names, but that might sounds risky for the politics like US for pressuring businesses or not. But the execution that despite we have a cereal war change into a pastry war, the subplots are nearly all over the place that its near difficult to follow the plot and messy. As for the humors, well, despite Seinfeld’s best effort for this jokes, it felt like he tried, while most of the jokes that I did chuckled at, but almost all of them are just cheap with gross humors and pop culture references that they just feels low brows to downright stupid.

While the story for being fiction is good, but it was poorly executions with cheap plot holes and poorly humors attempts, maybe I should’ve watching Seinfeld in the first place…

The Presentation

The film’s number of its budget isn’t shown, which im assuming they spending about less than $50M, im just guessing, but the movie’s presentation is actually pretty good looking, for the most parts.

For started, their filming was taking place on California as a setup for taking place in Battle Creek, Michigan, and having the sets with decoration and even cars made in early 60s. And I gotta say, they did a pretty good job for their set, sure there are some could be either loose or exaggerated, but still, it looks pretty good when they tried.

As for the costumes and other designs, I will give a credit when they did the old school mascot works that I also think they did a nice work, some either follow accurately for the old mascot appearance, or some are possibly made their own. But if there’s one thing that im not a fan about the mascot, is when they using them as a Trump supporting rioters at Capitol Riot in 2021, I’ve mentioned in my “Top 11 Controversial moments of 2021” when seeing they rioted for sore losing reason when Joe Biden is the current US President is just so bad that it caused damages and even people’s life at risk, which for some reason, they decided to copying it to the movie when Kellogg’s are making their own Pop-Tarts, I find it to be stupidly exploitative to using Capitol Riot as a joke reference.

As for the visual gags, it was low brow as I said before, most of them can give me a chuckle, but everything else made me question like “Why do you made a ravioli comes to life with a bellow average CG?” or even “Why would you have IBM in Kellogg’s business??”.

But one last thing il give a credit (even if its out of context), at least the music and the soundtrack are pretty good and fitting for taking place in the 60s.

The movie’s presentation is good at best to be passable, even if there’s some parts are either questionable or even exaggerated.

The Characters

For a weak writing, this sounds like all the characters are bad, right? Well, yes and no. But of course, this movie has a ridiculous all-star cast.

Lets starts with Bob Cabana (played by Jerry Seinfeld) the head of development of Kellogg’s who’s looking for something new for both helping and financially on his business when Kellogg’s is in a rivalry at Post’s, until the fruity themed pastry will be his new invention for Kellogg’s. I find him to be a fairly decent main protagonist, he’s businessman who’s looking for ambition to creating something than just keep making cereals for gearing towards kids, especially for his sacrifice to finding something new or he’ll be screwed off from his boss.

He’s meant to be a fictional version of William Post, who’s originally born as Dutch immigrant but became American to be in food business, started working on cookie company before he was approached from Kellogg’s to creating toaster fruity themed pastry, along with taking less seriously for his project with multiple of samples, and the rest as they say, was history.

While his jokes are okay, but despite the problematic, I think he did a nice work of his role, I guess I could say his acting is better than being his own direction of his film, I know he’s trying, but just poorly executed as I said before.

Next up is Donna “Stan” Stankowski (played by Melissa McCarthy, aka Detective Connie Edwards from The Happytime Murders), she’s Bob’s partner who used to working with Kellogg’s before that she works on NASA as a food scientist before she’s rehired from Kellogg’s to make Pop-Tarts. I find her to be passable and odd, the latter of which that, at first, I though I don’t remember if there’s a food scientist in NASA, but im pretty sure they do from my small research that if we like to be in space, we need foods to hanging in a space shuttle, but digress. Even though she’s meant to be a co-creator of Pop-Tarts, but she also shares her struggle she (and most ladies back in the old days) was frustrated how some businesses didn’t give a shareable pay as men (typical business back in the old days…), as for her humor, I find some of her jokes are subpar for say the least, even though I find her passable, but not as good than Bob.

After that, we have Edsel Kellogg III (played by Jim Gaffigan), he’s the boss of Kellogg’s and im assuming his name is reference to Ford (since the Ford Family had one of their kid name Edsel), anyway, while he’s the boss of his own brand, but he’s also kinda taking seriously for his rivalry against Post’s the success of breakfast like cereal, even if he was doubt about pastry, until accepting to approaching. He’s rather mixed, he’s sometimes to be nice for his running business brands for marketing for kids with cereals, but also somewhat taking business seriously. I find him alright as well, he’s just a typical boss that he cares about success while in a rivalry at Post, and Jim did a fairly descent role of his performance.

Then there’s Thurl Racenscroft (played by Hugh Grant), a Shakespearean actor who plays the mascot Tony the tiger of Frosted Flakes that he wants pensions in his business as a mascot actor at Kellogg’s without getting screwed that he, and some other mascot actors to going union. I think he’s meant to be the main villain in this movie that when Kellogg’s are focusing on fruity toasted pastry, that could cause a downgrade of cereals that mascot actors will get paid less, jeez, another situation of people paid less situation, but its not sexist compare to Stan’s problematic pay (cause honestly, the ladies deserve better for same pay as men). However, despite he wants pensions for cereal products, does he has to do with the main plot? The answer is… 25%, while he’s grew frustration for Kellogg’s change, but he’s not really a true villain (again, we assume). But of course, he’s loosely based on a real life Thurl Ravenscroft, who’s the spokesperson of Frosted Flakes by portraying as Tony the tiger for more than decades (damn, what a career for Thurl) and he’s also a famous singer in movies like “You’re a Mean One, Mr. Grinch” in “How The Grinch Stole Christmas” and even into Disney props from movies to theme parks at Disneyland. Questionable role aside, at least Hugh Grant is also did a nice work of his role, then again, even if Thurl’s depiction is loosely.

Last but not least is Marjorie Post (played by…. Ugh… Amy Schumer…), the rival at Kellogg’s and she’s the big boss of Post’s, when she wants to get her brand to be dominant and probably caring on her own business, wealth, and her ego, who’s basically… A female version of Elon Musk, but wanting to taking down in rivalry. Its no stranger she’s based on “Marjorie Merriweather Post” who’s the next generation Post’s family business and she’s a fangirl of Russia based on her collection of Russian Art, yeah I guess its not hard to see why’s depicted as a villain for both rich and Russophile (Sounds like a mix of Elon Musk and Steve Seagal, the latter of which he’s also a Russia supporter, F*** Seagal…!). As for her depiction and her humor, well, if you’ve read in my review of Barbie Movie, Amy Schumer is such a lame comedian, since I listened to her jokes, I find her to be unfunny and probably a bad role model that some people loved her, like, I don’t know why, since a couple years ago, she had a legal trouble and she was accused for offensive jokes and stealing jokes. Which pretty means before you ask, yes, im not a fan of her for being unfunny and probably untalented comedian, her acting is okay, but not for her “Comedy”, so attack me all you want, fans of Amy Schumer, but there’s no way to defend or escaping her when she got herself a curveball a couple years ago.

As for the rest of the characters, they’re aren’t as special, aside of their one dimensional from either stereotypes, gimmick or even trying to referencing from real life people.

There’s Harry Friendly and Mike Diamond (played by Peter Dinklage and Christian Slater), they’re the mafia of milks that they’re going after Bob for money (probably a demanding bribery for milk before the milk company are going down to have “Got Milk?” ads, just wondering), despite they’re just showing up for filler, John F. Kennedy (played by Bill Blurr) who’s the fictional version of JFK, the 35th president of USA before the infamous assassination took himself, despite he gives a cheap plot device from the concern of potential battle between US and Russia, Tom Carvel (played by Adrian Martinez) who’s a typical big businessman based on his history of inventing and promoting soft ice cream, Steve Schwinn (played by Jack McBrayer) is the inventor of bicycles for children (despite Schwinn brand wasn’t just made bikes for kids, but general people as well), Harold von Braunhunt (played by Thomas Lennon) who invented the Sea-Monkeys for pets and for some reason, a German Immigrant (I guess they want to avoiding Harold’s dark history that he’s a white supremacist, despite been born from Jewish family. Ouch…!), Chef Boyardee (played by Bobby Moynihan) who’s basically a fictional chef comes to life with his… Italian-ism stereotype, Jack LaLanne (played by James Marsden) who’s a fitness guru with his handsome muscular cliché, and Rick Ludwin (played by Max Greenfield) who’s gentle and careful Marjorie’s employee at Post’s.

Do the casts make them good, not so much for poor script, but il give some appreciation for their performance. Except for Amy Schumer, she’s forgettable “comedian”.

And now for my final opinion of this film

Overall, while its the first time I reviewing Netflix’s movie, but its nowhere good start for my first taste in my review (no pun attended).

While I enjoy its presentation (most of them), some good acting and a unique fictional true story. But everything has fell apart really badly when they “trying” to make jokes, it felt like they’re not even trying to be funny, which again, it feels like Seinfeld forgot to realizing that we’re NOT in the 90s, despite there are some jokes I had some chuckles, some presentation could get exaggerated and questionable inclusions like IBM computer or even referencing the worst sore losing riot in American history, cheap subplots, poor writing and some characters, despite some are good and il give credit to some actors, but they’re just either one dimensional or bellow average at best.

Even though I got myself my first review on Netflix, but sadly, this feels like a terrible mistake to pick one movie in a bad result that Im so regretful for watching this wasted opportunity of this movie. If you’re a fan of Seinfeld, maybe this one is for you, but others like me, im not recommending this movie, it just bellow average that it “tries” to be funny, but again, felt flat so bad like being tripped from untied shoes.

With a disappointing result what I got myself into, im gonna give this one a 3.5/10, along with earning the Dumpster Fire of FAILURE…!

*sigh* I feel like im going back to another crappy movies…! Like I just made a positive return with Godzilla and Kong, but now I feel like im going backward with negative results…! Could this get any worse in 2024…?!

*groan* So this ends of my movie review, if you guys have your opinion or any suggestions, let me know at comment bellow and support me on KO-FI.com/blackevil.

Thanks for reading, and im Anthony, signing out.